 | | From: | Dennis Kemmerer | | Subject: | Re: The topic of same sex marriage. | | Date: | Sat, 22 Jan 2005 18:09:30 -0800 |
|
|
 | "joseph irvin" wrote in message
news:LmAId.69310$w62.15723@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>
> "Dennis Kemmerer" wrote in message
> news:35fcn4F4im1mdU2@individual.net...
> > "joseph irvin" wrote in message
> > news:b8lId.64816$w62.31479@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > >
> > > "L. Michael Roberts" wrote in message
> > > news:svOdneW92JsDB2zcRVn-jQ@golden.net...
> > > > joseph irvin wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > "Josh Rosenbluth" wrote in
message
> > > > > news:HaudnTm9_rZF2m3cRVn-qw@comcast.com...
> > > > >
> > > > >>Dennis Kemmerer wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>"joseph irvin" wrote in message
> > > > >>>news:cCWHd.56972$w62.6370@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > The Act passed the House of Representatives by a vote of 342 to
67,
> > and
> > > the
> > > > > Senate by a vote of 85 to 14. Those congressional votes and the
> > passage
> > > of
> > > > > similar defensive marriage laws in 38 states express an
overwhelming
> > > > > consensus in our country for protecting the institution of
marriage.
> > > >
> > > > Protecting? What does it need to be protected from/against?
> > >
> > > Marriage being between a man and woman becoming husband and wife.
> >
> > I wouldn't worry, men and women will still get married just as much as
> they
> > do now.
> >
> > Take a break sparky. Your head's starting to spin too fast.
>
> Try to pay attention, I never one time said or implied men or women would
> stop getting married.
You're an idiot.
|
|
| | From: | Andrealphus | | Subject: | Re: The topic of same sex marriage. | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 02:13:01 GMT |
|
|
| Dennis Kemmerer wrote:
> "joseph irvin" wrote in message
> news:LmAId.69310$w62.15723@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>>
>> "Dennis Kemmerer" wrote in message
>> news:35fcn4F4im1mdU2@individual.net...
>>> "joseph irvin" wrote in message
>>> news:b8lId.64816$w62.31479@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>>>>
>>>> "L. Michael Roberts" wrote in
>>>> message news:svOdneW92JsDB2zcRVn-jQ@golden.net...
>>>>> joseph irvin wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Josh Rosenbluth" wrote in
>>>>>> message news:HaudnTm9_rZF2m3cRVn-qw@comcast.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dennis Kemmerer wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "joseph irvin" wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:cCWHd.56972$w62.6370@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> The Act passed the House of Representatives by a vote of 342 to
> 67,
>>> and
>>>> the
>>>>>> Senate by a vote of 85 to 14. Those congressional votes and the
>>>>>> passage of similar defensive marriage laws in 38 states express
>>>>>> an overwhelming consensus in our country for protecting the
>>>>>> institution of marriage.
>>>>>
>>>>> Protecting? What does it need to be protected from/against?
>>>>
>>>> Marriage being between a man and woman becoming husband and wife.
>>>
>>> I wouldn't worry, men and women will still get married just as much
>>> as they do now.
>>>
>>> Take a break sparky. Your head's starting to spin too fast.
>>
>> Try to pay attention, I never one time said or implied men or women
>> would stop getting married.
>
> You're an idiot.
Indeed. The guy had me quoting him, so he could remember what he said two
days prior. He's got more spin than a merry-go-round.
--
"Only Buddhism is compatible with science. It covers the smallest
particles to the largest creations of the cosmos. It is the only
religion capable of scientific truth."
Albert Einstein
|
|
| | From: | Dennis Kemmerer | | Subject: | Re: The topic of same sex marriage. | | Date: | Sat, 22 Jan 2005 18:18:56 -0800 |
|
|
| "Andrealphus" wrote in message
news:NKDId.3117$YD5.910@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> Dennis Kemmerer wrote:
> > "joseph irvin" wrote in message
> > news:LmAId.69310$w62.15723@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> >>
> >> "Dennis Kemmerer" wrote in message
> >> news:35fcn4F4im1mdU2@individual.net...
> >>> "joseph irvin" wrote in message
> >>> news:b8lId.64816$w62.31479@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> >>>>
> >>>> "L. Michael Roberts" wrote in
> >>>> message news:svOdneW92JsDB2zcRVn-jQ@golden.net...
> >>>>> joseph irvin wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> "Josh Rosenbluth" wrote in
> >>>>>> message news:HaudnTm9_rZF2m3cRVn-qw@comcast.com...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Dennis Kemmerer wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> "joseph irvin" wrote in message
> >>>>>>>> news:cCWHd.56972$w62.6370@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> The Act passed the House of Representatives by a vote of 342 to
> > 67,
> >>> and
> >>>> the
> >>>>>> Senate by a vote of 85 to 14. Those congressional votes and the
> >>>>>> passage of similar defensive marriage laws in 38 states express
> >>>>>> an overwhelming consensus in our country for protecting the
> >>>>>> institution of marriage.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Protecting? What does it need to be protected from/against?
> >>>>
> >>>> Marriage being between a man and woman becoming husband and wife.
> >>>
> >>> I wouldn't worry, men and women will still get married just as much
> >>> as they do now.
> >>>
> >>> Take a break sparky. Your head's starting to spin too fast.
> >>
> >> Try to pay attention, I never one time said or implied men or women
> >> would stop getting married.
> >
> > You're an idiot.
>
> Indeed. The guy had me quoting him, so he could remember what he said
two
> days prior. He's got more spin than a merry-go-round.
He doesn't understand his own arguments. It's like debating a 3rd grader.
|
|
| | From: | Andrealphus | | Subject: | Re: The topic of same sex marriage. | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 02:23:13 GMT |
|
|
| Dennis Kemmerer wrote:
> "Andrealphus" wrote in message
> news:NKDId.3117$YD5.910@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> Dennis Kemmerer wrote:
>>> "joseph irvin" wrote in message
>>> news:LmAId.69310$w62.15723@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>>>>
>>>> "Dennis Kemmerer" wrote in message
>>>> news:35fcn4F4im1mdU2@individual.net...
>>>>> "joseph irvin" wrote in message
>>>>> news:b8lId.64816$w62.31479@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "L. Michael Roberts" wrote in
>>>>>> message news:svOdneW92JsDB2zcRVn-jQ@golden.net...
>>>>>>> joseph irvin wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Josh Rosenbluth" wrote in
>>>>>>>> message news:HaudnTm9_rZF2m3cRVn-qw@comcast.com...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dennis Kemmerer wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "joseph irvin" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> news:cCWHd.56972$w62.6370@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The Act passed the House of Representatives by a vote of 342 to
>>> 67,
>>>>> and
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> Senate by a vote of 85 to 14. Those congressional votes and the
>>>>>>>> passage of similar defensive marriage laws in 38 states express
>>>>>>>> an overwhelming consensus in our country for protecting the
>>>>>>>> institution of marriage.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Protecting? What does it need to be protected from/against?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Marriage being between a man and woman becoming husband and wife.
>>>>>
>>>>> I wouldn't worry, men and women will still get married just as
>>>>> much as they do now.
>>>>>
>>>>> Take a break sparky. Your head's starting to spin too fast.
>>>>
>>>> Try to pay attention, I never one time said or implied men or women
>>>> would stop getting married.
>>>
>>> You're an idiot.
>>
>> Indeed. The guy had me quoting him, so he could remember what he
>> said two days prior. He's got more spin than a merry-go-round.
>
> He doesn't understand his own arguments. It's like debating a 3rd
> grader.
Agreed.
--
"Only Buddhism is compatible with science. It covers the smallest
particles to the largest creations of the cosmos. It is the only
religion capable of scientific truth."
Albert Einstein
|
|
