|
|
 | | From: | JM | | Subject: | Re: #SUPER-TERRORIST GIVE EXCUSES FOR THE 911 ATTACKS HAPPENING! | | Date: | Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:13:07 -0500 |
|
|
 | Your very good at cut and past BS are you not????
You sure like to perpetuate your lies!!!
Go put your tin hat on and take your meds and you will feel
better!!!
"Susan Williams" wrote in
message news:dc9rt053lkdo6td299njdb1hr86hj0kou0@4ax.com...
> 3,000 people died because of that tragedy, for which I,
like them if
> they were ressurrected, contend THERE IS NO EXCUSE!!
>
> The following is a dialogue with one member of that great
army oathed
> to put America into confusion over the issue of whether or
not the 911
> attack should have gotten through based upon the
variables. The
> response I got is a challenge to my presentation that the
911 incident
> SHOULD NEVER HAVE HAPPENED!...
>
>
> On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:30:58 -0500, "DropCloth"
> wrote:
>
> >"Susan Williams" wrote
in message
> >news:t68nt0p5c8u5a3lkt25ptfneilp0jgbds7@4ax.com...
> >> THE PURPOSE OF DIVERSITY! Part I
> >>
> >> You can see the whle series on the Adventism Defended
website:
> >> http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com/DiversityI.html
> >>
> >> Updated 10/18/2001: Made easier to print out. Updated
12/11/2004:
> >> slight changes and additions to text.
> >>
> >> We are in a very critical situation today. Three
planes plowed into
> >> the WTC buildings penetrating straight through
traditionally
> >> heavily-controlled airspace and met their targets
without even a
> >> military jet to accompany them. Those planes traveled
from far
> >> distances in terror attacks that were planned by
Islamic extremists.
> >> From that distance how did they know they would
penetrate? Such a
> >> distance to travel at the risk of being laughing stocks
to the Islamic
> >> world!
> >
> >
> >
> >I don't even have to read any further since the very
first paragraph is full
> >of errors.
> >- "Three planes plowed into the WTC buildings"...Hmm, I
remember two at the
> >WTC, one at the Pentagon and one in PA. If you can't
even get something as
> >simple as that correct why would anyone even think you
could get an analysis
> >of a complicated situation correct?
>
> Don't be paranoid, Jesuit, and think that because the
absolute
> symantics is not correct, the whole thing must be
scrapped? It got
> you awake and made you neglect your kids, didn't it?
>
> >- "Those planes traveled from far distances"? Hmm,
Boston to NYC is a far
> >distance I guess if you never leave your own back yard.
>
> Don' be paranoid, Jesuit, for planes under FAA rules, it
doesn't have
> to be off course that much for them to know that there is
trouble.
> Why did you err here?
>
> Far distance? Walk it, dude!
>
> >To the rest of us
> >it's not very far at all.
>
> Walk it! To FAA rules, IT IS! The transponders were
turned off and
> the towers knew the planes were hijacked long enough for
military
> planes to get there. If not...
>
> LET US IMBIBE OF YOUR COMMON SENSE TO THINK THAT THE SAME
THING CAN
> THEN HAPPEN AGAIN TODAY!
>
> >- "how did they know they could penetrate"...if you're
talking about the
> >terrorists, considering the number of illegal immigrants
who enter the
> >country every day I would say their chances of
successfully entering the
> >country were very good.
>
> You mean how do the terrorists know they can do the same
thing again
> today???
>
> >If you are talking about the airplanes, penetrating
> >through the controlled airspace is also a simple thing,
especially
> >considering they didn't have to do it for very long.
Anyone who flies an
> >airplane understands that.
>
> You mean they can do it again today? This one sounds like
he knows
> how to do it!! You mean those women crying while looking
at the WTC
> buildings falling and asking how the hell those planes
penetrated
> should have known that it was just as easy as it is
today???
>
> >- "without even a military jet to accompany them"...If
you took the time to
> >learn what alert postures are, what kind of posture we
were in before 9/11,
> >how long it actually takes to arm, man and launch an
aircraft and then how
> >long it takes to actually conduct an intercept and locate
the correct
> >target, you would have some understanding why there were
no military
> >aircraft flying in formation or shooting these aircraft
down.
>
> After the transponders were turned off, the radar showed
that the
> planes were still traveling and then were diverted, then
communication
> with flight crew showing that the planes were hijacked??
>
> Remember, that on the third plane where the passengers
were thinking
> about attacking the terrorists, THEN a military jet showed
up to take
> care of the problem. BUT WHAT WAS THE PROBLEM???
>
> Again this terrorist is telling us it can easily happen
again and that
> we are nuts for expecting military jets to show up in
controlled air
> space!
>
> >- "risk of being laughing stocks to the Islamic
world"...for what?
>
> For not understanding why such a plot would be easily
caught based on
> the variables, and for other Islamists asking why they
would even
> attempt something like that!
>
> >The
> >Islamic world routinely praises those who "attempt" to
carry out attacks
> >even if the attack itself is unsuccessful.
>
> But yet so stupidly? With such a natural failure if our
government
> did its job?
>
> >So, the probability of being a
> >laughing stock was laughably remote.
>
> Why would they attempt such a ridiculous feat with all the
variables
> and risk being laughing stocks of the Islamic world?
>
> >Spend a little time on getting the facts straight please.
>
> Yes but why would terrorists plan such a feat at the risk
of being
> laughing stocks?
>
> Show us why we should not have expected military jets in
the sky as
> was immediately asked Dick Cheney after the attack. His
reply was not
> like yours. He said military jets were not there because
they didn't
> want to shoot the planes down!
>
> I bet you also can't realize that people posted that all
non-Catholics
> must die over the internet and can only attack those who
alert the
> people about it!
>
> In His Grace,
>
>
> Susan
>
>
> x-- 100 Proof News - http://www.100ProofNews.com
> x-- 3,500+ Binary NewsGroups, and over 90,000 other
groups
> x-- Access to over 1 Terabyte per Day - $8.95/Month
> x-- UNLIMITED DOWNLOAD
>
|
|
|
