inetbot web crawler
Main  |  Get access to the repository  |  API  |  The robot  |  Publications  |  Usenet Groups  |  Plainweb  | 
 inetbot - Groups (beta)

Current group: comp.lsi

DRAM circuits

DRAM circuits  
Adnan Aziz
 Re: DRAM circuits  
daytripper
From:Adnan Aziz
Subject:DRAM circuits
Date:9 Nov 2004 14:28:56 -0800
hi everyone,

i teach a graduate vlsi class at UT austin, and there were a couple of
questions in my last lecture on DRAMs that i couldnt answer.

the text (weste and harris, "cmos vlsi design", 3rd edition, excellent
book) and my DRAM reference (keeth & baker, dram circuit design)
werent much help, so i thought i'd post the questions on the net.

- Q1. why is the bitline pre-charged to V_DD/2 (instead of V_DD). i
thought this would be for performance, i.e., get a larger swing
quicker, but at least from a simple model, the opposite seems to be
true. perhaps it's related to power or noise?

- Q2. shouldn't DRAM writes be faster than reads? (the logic being
that in reads, the bitline is driven by the trench capacitor, but in
writes the bitlinehas an active driver. perhaps the reason has
something to do with senseamp logic compensating for the slow read.)

looking forward to reading your replies,


cheers,
adnan

-------------------------------------------
Adnan Aziz, Dept. of Elect. and Comp. Eng.,
The University of Texas, Austin TX, 78712
1 (512) 475-9774 www.ece.utexas.edu/~adnan
-------------------------------------------
From:daytripper
Subject:Re: DRAM circuits
Date:Tue, 09 Nov 2004 23:22:53 GMT
On 9 Nov 2004 14:28:56 -0800, adnan_aziz@hotmail.com (Adnan Aziz) wrote:

>hi everyone,
>
>i teach a graduate vlsi class at UT austin, and there were a couple of
>questions in my last lecture on DRAMs that i couldnt answer.
>
>the text (weste and harris, "cmos vlsi design", 3rd edition, excellent
>book) and my DRAM reference (keeth & baker, dram circuit design)
>werent much help, so i thought i'd post the questions on the net.
>
> - Q1. why is the bitline pre-charged to V_DD/2 (instead of V_DD). i
>thought this would be for performance, i.e., get a larger swing
>quicker, but at least from a simple model, the opposite seems to be
>true. perhaps it's related to power or noise?

SWAG: back in the stone age of early DRAM arrays, some bits read 0 as a low
voltage and some as a high voltage. VDD/2 is smack in the middle so it's a
good place to precharge the bitline as it doesn't favor picking or dropping
bits.

> - Q2. shouldn't DRAM writes be faster than reads? (the logic being
>that in reads, the bitline is driven by the trench capacitor, but in
>writes the bitlinehas an active driver. perhaps the reason has
>something to do with senseamp logic compensating for the slow read.)
>
>looking forward to reading your replies,

How are you measuring read vs write operations? At the pins?

Unless you managed to write an entire row in one shot, every write is really a
read-modify-write operation...
   

Copyright © 2006 inetbot   -   All rights reserved