inetbot web crawler
Main  |  Get access to the repository  |  API  |  The robot  |  Publications  |  Usenet Groups  |  Plainweb  | 
 inetbot - Groups (beta)

Current group: comp.object.

Re: Static vs dynamic

Re: Static vs dynamic  
igouy at yahoo.com
From:igouy at yahoo.com
Subject:Re: Static vs dynamic
Date:12 Jan 2005 13:21:46 -0800
"Adding methods at runtime isn't possible with strongly typed classes."
isn't currently possible in C#.

Even static type checking enthusiasts have an interest in dynamic type
checking: "The ability of Clean, as well as other functional languages,
to construct new functions (e.g. currying, higher-order functions, or
function composition) in combination with Clean's new support for
run-time linking, enables us to extend a running application with new
code that can be type checked after which it is guaranteed to fit."

Towards a Strongly Typed Functional Operating System
ftp://ftp.cs.kun.nl/pub/Clean/papers/2003/vWeA2003-Famke.pdf
   

Copyright © 2006 inetbot   -   All rights reserved