|
|
 | | From: | Ed Earl Ross | | Subject: | Some Novel Solar Energy Ideas | | Date: | Sun, 16 Jan 2005 20:47:55 GMT |
|
|
 | See: http://solaroof.org/pmwiki6/pmwiki.php/SolaRoof/HomePage
This site discusses several solar energy technologies, including
100% carbon sequestration from coal or gas fired power plants and a
method of using bubbles in a roof to both insulate from heat and
moderate transmitted solar energy.
|
|
| | From: | Duane C. Johnson | | Subject: | Re: Some Novel Solar Energy Ideas | | Date: | Mon, 17 Jan 2005 21:11:33 -0600 |
|
|
| Hi Ed;
Ed Earl Ross wrote:
> See: http://solaroof.org/pmwiki6/pmwiki.php/SolaRoof/HomePage
Interesting!
> This site discusses several solar energy technologies,
> including 100% carbon sequestration from coal or gas fired
> power plants
> and a method of using bubbles in a roof to both insulate
> from heat and moderate transmitted solar energy.
What's novel about this?
Patents on this technology date from 1972 & 1982. See:
http://www.redrok.com/neat.htm#insulation
Duane
--
Home of the $35 Solar Tracker Receiver
http://www.redrok.com/electron.htm#led3X [*]
Powered by \ \ \ //|
Thermonuclear Solar Energy from the Sun / |
Energy (the SUN) \ \ \ / / |
Red Rock Energy \ \ / / |
Duane C. Johnson Designer \ \ / \ / |
1825 Florence St Heliostat,Control,& Mounts |
White Bear Lake, Minnesota === \ / \ |
USA 55110-3364 === \ |
(651)426-4766 use Courier New Font \ |
redrok@redrok.com (my email: address) \ |
http://www.redrok.com (Web site) ===
|
|
| | From: | Ed Earl Ross | | Subject: | Re: Some Novel Solar Energy Ideas | | Date: | Tue, 18 Jan 2005 04:08:34 GMT |
|
|
| Duane C. Johnson wrote:
> Hi Ed;
>
> Ed Earl Ross wrote:
>
>> See: http://solaroof.org/pmwiki6/pmwiki.php/SolaRoof/HomePage
>
>
> Interesting!
>
>> This site discusses several solar energy technologies,
>
> > including 100% carbon sequestration from coal or gas fired
> > power plants
>
> > and a method of using bubbles in a roof to both insulate
> > from heat and moderate transmitted solar energy.
>
> What's novel about this?
> Patents on this technology date from 1972 & 1982. See:
> http://www.redrok.com/neat.htm#insulation
>
> Duane
>
Dictionary.com "Strikingly new, unusual, or different."
Choose all that apply:
1. The ideas are strikingly unusual and different. Though, not
actually new, they were new to me.
2. New is a relative term. They are very new, compared to the age
of the universe.
3. I was trying to market some interesting ideas.
4. Your question belongs on alt.English.
Are you making a point about energy? Don't answer. The question is
rhetorical and it's likely that no one cares.
|
|
| | From: | Clarence_A | | Subject: | Re: Some Novel Solar Energy Ideas | | Date: | Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:26:12 GMT |
|
|
|
"Ed Earl Ross" wrote in message
news:41EC8B8E.6050102@satx.rr.com...
> Duane C. Johnson wrote:
> > Hi Ed;
> > Ed Earl Ross wrote:
> >> See: http://solaroof.org/pmwiki6/pmwiki.php/SolaRoof/HomePage
> > Interesting!
> >> This site discusses several solar energy technologies,
> > > including 100% carbon sequestration from coal or gas fired
> > > power plants
> > > and a method of using bubbles in a roof to both insulate
> > > from heat and moderate transmitted solar energy.
> >
> > What's novel about this?
> > Patents on this technology date from 1972 & 1982. See:
> > http://www.redrok.com/neat.htm#insulation
> > Duane
>
> Dictionary.com "Strikingly new, unusual, or different."
Which the method is NOT!
> Choose all that apply:
>
> 1. The ideas are strikingly unusual and different. Though, not
> actually new, they were new to me.
You are not the center of the universe, in fact you are only a
pimple!
> 2. New is a relative term. They are very new, compared to the
age
> of the universe.
They are not 'new' by any currently valid measure.
> 3. I was trying to market some interesting ideas.
So you admit that you are SPAMMING this NG?
> 4. Your question belongs on alt.English.
You are mistaken!
> Are you making a point about energy? Don't answer. The question
is
> rhetorical and it's likely that no one cares.
Clearly the meaning was to debunk your posting!
He has accomplished that with great flair!
I suspect that there are many who do not approve of the SPAMMING,
of even care for the posturing you use to justify the SPAMMING!
|
|
| | From: | Ed Earl Ross | | Subject: | Re: Some Novel Solar Energy Ideas | | Date: | Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:32:37 GMT |
|
|
| Clarence_A wrote:
> "Ed Earl Ross" wrote in message
> news:41EC8B8E.6050102@satx.rr.com...
>
>>Duane C. Johnson wrote:
>>
>>>Hi Ed;
>>>Ed Earl Ross wrote:
>>>
>>>>See: http://solaroof.org/pmwiki6/pmwiki.php/SolaRoof/HomePage
>>>
>>>Interesting!
>>>
>>>>This site discusses several solar energy technologies,
>>>
>>> > including 100% carbon sequestration from coal or gas fired
>>> > power plants
>>> > and a method of using bubbles in a roof to both insulate
>>> > from heat and moderate transmitted solar energy.
>>>
>>>What's novel about this?
>>>Patents on this technology date from 1972 & 1982. See:
>>>http://www.redrok.com/neat.htm#insulation
>>>Duane
>>
>>Dictionary.com "Strikingly new, unusual, or different."
>
>
> Which the method is NOT!
>
>
>>Choose all that apply:
>>
>>1. The ideas are strikingly unusual and different. Though, not
>>actually new, they were new to me.
>
>
> You are not the center of the universe, in fact you are only a
> pimple!
>
>
>>2. New is a relative term. They are very new, compared to the
>
> age
>
>>of the universe.
>
>
> They are not 'new' by any currently valid measure.
>
>
>>3. I was trying to market some interesting ideas.
>
>
> So you admit that you are SPAMMING this NG?
>
>
>>4. Your question belongs on alt.English.
>
>
> You are mistaken!
>
>
>>Are you making a point about energy? Don't answer. The question
>
> is
>
>>rhetorical and it's likely that no one cares.
>
>
> Clearly the meaning was to debunk your posting!
> He has accomplished that with great flair!
>
> I suspect that there are many who do not approve of the SPAMMING,
> of even care for the posturing you use to justify the SPAMMING!
Forgive me, Clarence, for flaming you. I woke up in a bad mood and
took it out on you.
|
|
| | From: | Duane C. Johnson | | Subject: | Re: Some Novel Solar Energy Ideas | | Date: | Tue, 18 Jan 2005 21:38:53 -0600 |
|
|
| Hi Ed;
Ed Earl Ross wrote:
> Duane C. Johnson wrote:
>> Ed Earl Ross wrote:
>>> See: http://solaroof.org/pmwiki6/pmwiki.php/SolaRoof/HomePage
>> Interesting!
>>> This site discusses several solar energy technologies,
>>> including 100% carbon sequestration from coal or
>>> gas fired power plants
>>> and a method of using bubbles in a roof to both insulate
>>> from heat and moderate transmitted solar energy.
>> What's novel about this?
>> Patents on this technology date from 1972 & 1982. See:
>> http://www.redrok.com/neat.htm#insulation
>> Duane
> Dictionary.com "Strikingly new, unusual, or different."
(Snipped the silly stuff.)
> Are you making a point about energy? Don't answer.
> The question is rhetorical and it's likely that
> no one cares.
We have discussed the Bubble Wall and Bead Wall
topics a number of times over the years on some of
these newsgroups. Maybe you should do some news group
searching to understand what has been done before.
For many applications these technologies can be
excellent performers.
Of course it's about the energy.
I was just pointing out the for fathers of this
subject should neither be forgotten nor ignored.
Duane
--
Home of the $35 Solar Tracker Receiver
http://www.redrok.com/electron.htm#led3X [*]
Powered by \ \ \ //|
Thermonuclear Solar Energy from the Sun / |
Energy (the SUN) \ \ \ / / |
Red Rock Energy \ \ / / |
Duane C. Johnson Designer \ \ / \ / |
1825 Florence St Heliostat,Control,& Mounts |
White Bear Lake, Minnesota === \ / \ |
USA 55110-3364 === \ |
(651)426-4766 use Courier New Font \ |
redrok@redrok.com (my email: address) \ |
http://www.redrok.com (Web site) ===
|
|
|
