|
|
 | | From: | Joseph H | | Subject: | A CHARTER FOR HUMANITY - 2 | | Date: | 20 Jan 2005 05:34:48 -0800 |
|
|
 | Anticorporation says that multinationals should not have the power to
exclude the weaker or so dominate societies.
How do you suggest that this power might be curbed? Legislation? Who
would enforced it? Global directives etc? Who would enforced them? A
new enhanced culture of the human individual, more aware of rights and
background....? I go for this last. It's slower...but it may offer
hope of a solution eventually.
Joseph H
|
|
| | From: | Steve Knight | | Subject: | Re: A CHARTER FOR HUMANITY - 2 | | Date: | Fri, 21 Jan 2005 01:26:02 GMT |
|
|
| On 20 Jan 2005 05:34:48 -0800, joseph@humanisation.org (Joseph H)
wrote:
>Anticorporation says that multinationals should not have the power to
>exclude the weaker or so dominate societies.
What a shocker! Are these weaker societies atheists? They must be.
Why else would you post this to an atheist newsgroup and intentionally
be off topic.
Just a sec.... I figured it...
You need an audience and don't give a fuck about rules and charters
and pesky little things like that.
Warlord Steve
BAAWA
www.sonic.net/~wooly
|
|
| | From: | Anticorporation | | Subject: | Re: A CHARTER FOR HUMANITY - 2 | | Date: | Fri, 21 Jan 2005 06:26:45 GMT |
|
|
|
"Steve Knight" wrote in message
news:osm0v0tu99ar4c392qf60l461jkorp9tk4@4ax.com...
> On 20 Jan 2005 05:34:48 -0800, joseph@humanisation.org (Joseph H)
> wrote:
>
>>Anticorporation says that multinationals should not have the power to
>>exclude the weaker or so dominate societies.
>
> What a shocker! Are these weaker societies atheists? They must be.
> Why else would you post this to an atheist newsgroup and intentionally
> be off topic.
>
> Just a sec.... I figured it...
>
> You need an audience and don't give a fuck about rules and charters
> and pesky little things like that.
>
> Warlord Steve
> BAAWA
> www.sonic.net/~wooly
What the fuck, who the fuck are you? Why are you posting in a philosophy
group, this is where I posted.
And, to clarify, I never said corporations should not
have the power to exclude the weak. I cited this as an example of why they
are more efficient than govt. at accomplishing a mission. I supose it is
for resons such as this you have never posted in philosophy before, you just
do not have what it takes to think your way out of the jack in the box.
And, do not worry, when I want an audience you will all be glued to CNN,
FOX and MSNBC to verify the bodycount. I am displaying the ARMEGEDDONIST as
a form of atheism not often given due credit for their extremism in such
causes as proving GODLINESS through superior firepower and the ability to
bring EVERYONE to their knees in absolute horror of things that can be done
to those who choose not to believe in the righteousness of the cause.
|
|
| | From: | Robibnikoff | | Subject: | Re: A CHARTER FOR HUMANITY - 2 | | Date: | Fri, 21 Jan 2005 07:26:45 -0500 |
|
|
|
"Anticorporation" wrote in message
news:Fg1Id.63261$Ew6.22066@twister.socal.rr.com...
>
> "Steve Knight" wrote in message
> news:osm0v0tu99ar4c392qf60l461jkorp9tk4@4ax.com...
>> On 20 Jan 2005 05:34:48 -0800, joseph@humanisation.org (Joseph H)
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Anticorporation says that multinationals should not have the power to
>>>exclude the weaker or so dominate societies.
>>
>> What a shocker! Are these weaker societies atheists? They must be.
>> Why else would you post this to an atheist newsgroup and intentionally
>> be off topic.
>>
>> Just a sec.... I figured it...
>>
>> You need an audience and don't give a fuck about rules and charters
>> and pesky little things like that.
>>
>> Warlord Steve
>> BAAWA
>> www.sonic.net/~wooly
>
> What the fuck, who the fuck are you? Why are you posting in a philosophy
> group, this is where I posted.
He's not. He's in alt.atheism where this thread has been crossposted.
Can't you read headers?
--
---------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
|
|
| | From: | Anticorporation | | Subject: | Re: A CHARTER FOR HUMANITY - 2 | | Date: | Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:41:03 GMT |
|
|
|
"Robibnikoff" wrote in message
news:35cao4F4lia3oU2@individual.net...
>
> "Anticorporation" wrote in message
> news:Fg1Id.63261$Ew6.22066@twister.socal.rr.com...
>>
>> "Steve Knight" wrote in message
>> news:osm0v0tu99ar4c392qf60l461jkorp9tk4@4ax.com...
>>> On 20 Jan 2005 05:34:48 -0800, joseph@humanisation.org (Joseph H)
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Anticorporation says that multinationals should not have the power to
>>>>exclude the weaker or so dominate societies.
>>>
>>> What a shocker! Are these weaker societies atheists? They must be.
>>> Why else would you post this to an atheist newsgroup and intentionally
>>> be off topic.
>>>
>>> Just a sec.... I figured it...
>>>
>>> You need an audience and don't give a fuck about rules and charters
>>> and pesky little things like that.
>>>
>>> Warlord Steve
>>> BAAWA
>>> www.sonic.net/~wooly
>>
>> What the fuck, who the fuck are you? Why are you posting in a philosophy
>> group, this is where I posted.
>
> He's not. He's in alt.atheism where this thread has been crossposted.
> Can't you read headers?
> --
> ---------
> Robyn
> Resident Witchypoo
> #1557
>
Ok, I am a complete loss here, isn't everybody who is posting in the
thread posting to all the groups? Does this mean if there is any post with
any other group than alt philosophy I have to erase all the other groups
from the header?
How come I am the only one getting shit, what the fuck, why is everyone
against me? I am for the people. I am not going to pretend I know
everything yet about this newsgroup stuff yet, fuck, someone said I was a
'top-poster' too, now what is that?
I think this is all bullshit and the govt. hired you to fuck with me, I
looked through and almost all the threads have more than one group, what
about those vegetarian people?
Please explain all this crap, I am sure I am not the only one who does not
understand it all, and, shouldn't the person who starts the thread be
blamed, not those who respond?
|
|
| | From: | John Jones | | Subject: | Re: A CHARTER FOR HUMANITY - 2 | | Date: | 21 Jan 2005 11:05:17 -0800 |
|
|
|
Anticorporation wrote:
> "Robibnikoff" wrote in message
> news:35cao4F4lia3oU2@individual.net...
> >
> > "Anticorporation" wrote in message
> > news:Fg1Id.63261$Ew6.22066@twister.socal.rr.com...
> >>
> >> "Steve Knight" wrote in message
> >> news:osm0v0tu99ar4c392qf60l461jkorp9tk4@4ax.com...
> >>> On 20 Jan 2005 05:34:48 -0800, joseph@humanisation.org (Joseph H)
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Anticorporation says that multinationals should not have the
power to
> >>>>exclude the weaker or so dominate societies.
> >>>
> >>> What a shocker! Are these weaker societies atheists? They must
be.
> >>> Why else would you post this to an atheist newsgroup and
intentionally
> >>> be off topic.
> >>>
> >>> Just a sec.... I figured it...
> >>>
> >>> You need an audience and don't give a fuck about rules and
charters
> >>> and pesky little things like that.
> >>>
> >>> Warlord Steve
> >>> BAAWA
> >>> www.sonic.net/~wooly
> >>
> >> What the fuck, who the fuck are you? Why are you posting in a
philosophy
> >> group, this is where I posted.
> >
> > He's not. He's in alt.atheism where this thread has been
crossposted.
> > Can't you read headers?
> > --
> > ---------
> > Robyn
> > Resident Witchypoo
> > #1557
> >
>
> Ok, I am a complete loss here, isn't everybody who is posting in
the
> thread posting to all the groups? Does this mean if there is any
post with
> any other group than alt philosophy I have to erase all the other
groups
> from the header?
>
> How come I am the only one getting shit, what the fuck, why is
everyone
> against me? I am for the people. I am not going to pretend I know
> everything yet about this newsgroup stuff yet, fuck, someone said I
was a
> 'top-poster' too, now what is that?
>
> I think this is all bullshit and the govt. hired you to fuck with
me, I
> looked through and almost all the threads have more than one group,
what
> about those vegetarian people?
>
> Please explain all this crap, I am sure I am not the only one who
does not
> understand it all, and, shouldn't the person who starts the thread be
> blamed, not those who respond?
I only post to alt.philosophy but in the past have posted elsewhere,
perahaps three places. Some basrtards post to all the newsgroups under
the sun so we get immature wankers from all directions. Like HVAC and
some other delinquent wankers.
JJ
Toposting is when you use something like outlook express where it is
easier to put your post above the one you are replying to. I always did
that. It is better except that in the google group you can bottompost -
this is not confusing as it is in outlook express bbecause in google
you have an OPTION to see the post above yours which you are replying
to.
JJ
|
|
|
