From:	cliff84373 at yahoo.co.uk
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	20 Jan 2005 03:39:04 -0800

What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I the
only one who's tired of competing with women and other minorities for
jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?

I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
and let them go out and earn the money.

From:	Gregory Procter
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:44:15 +1300

cliff84373@yahoo.co.uk wrote:

> What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I the
> only one who's tired of competing with women and other minorities for
> jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
>
> I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
> and let them go out and earn the money.

Where are all these extra women going to come from?

From:	Andrealphus
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:03:57 GMT

Gregory Procter wrote:
> cliff84373@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
>
>> What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I
>> the only one who's tired of competing with women and other
>> minorities for jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
>>
>> I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
>> and let them go out and earn the money.
>
> Where are all these extra women going to come from?

You compete for them. Looks, $$, etc... just like they did in ancient
times. Not everyone is going to get 4 or 5, and most will be stuck with the
really ugly women.

--
"Only Buddhism is compatible with science. It covers the smallest
particles to the largest creations of the cosmos. It is the only
religion capable of scientific truth."

Albert Einstein

From:	Gregory Procter
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:42:57 +1300

Andrealphus wrote:

> Gregory Procter wrote:
> > cliff84373@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> >
> >> What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I
> >> the only one who's tired of competing with women and other
> >> minorities for jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
> >>
> >> I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
> >> and let them go out and earn the money.
> >
> > Where are all these extra women going to come from?
>
> You compete for them. Looks, $$, etc... just like they did in ancient
> times. Not everyone is going to get 4 or 5, and most will be stuck with the
> really ugly women.

My commiserations in that case!
What the hell am I going to do with ten women?

From:	Andrealphus
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 19:53:28 GMT

Gregory Procter wrote:
> Andrealphus wrote:
>
>> Gregory Procter wrote:
>>> cliff84373@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
>>>
>>>> What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I
>>>> the only one who's tired of competing with women and other
>>>> minorities for jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
>>>>
>>>> I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the
>>>> Bible and let them go out and earn the money.
>>>
>>> Where are all these extra women going to come from?
>>
>> You compete for them. Looks, $$, etc... just like they did in
>> ancient times. Not everyone is going to get 4 or 5, and most will
>> be stuck with the really ugly women.
>
> My commiserations in that case!
> What the hell am I going to do with ten women?

Not much. The nagging alone will kill you in a fairly short time.

--
"Only Buddhism is compatible with science. It covers the smallest
particles to the largest creations of the cosmos. It is the only
religion capable of scientific truth."

Albert Einstein

From:	Gregory Procter
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:09:32 +1300

Andrealphus wrote:

> Gregory Procter wrote:
> > Andrealphus wrote:
> >
> >> Gregory Procter wrote:
> >>> cliff84373@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I
> >>>> the only one who's tired of competing with women and other
> >>>> minorities for jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
> >>>>
> >>>> I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the
> >>>> Bible and let them go out and earn the money.
> >>>
> >>> Where are all these extra women going to come from?
> >>
> >> You compete for them. Looks, $$, etc... just like they did in
> >> ancient times. Not everyone is going to get 4 or 5, and most will
> >> be stuck with the really ugly women.
> >
> > My commiserations in that case!
> > What the hell am I going to do with ten women?
>
> Not much. The nagging alone will kill you in a fairly short time.
>

That wouldn't be a problem - I'm sure I'd be glad of the rest!

From:	America the Beautiful
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:08:30 -0500

Andrealphus wrote:

> Gregory Procter wrote:
>
>>cliff84373@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
>>
>>
>>>What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I
>>>the only one who's tired of competing with women and other
>>>minorities for jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
>>>
>>>I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
>>>and let them go out and earn the money.
>>
>>Where are all these extra women going to come from?
>
>
> You compete for them. Looks, $$, etc... just like they did in ancient
> times. Not everyone is going to get 4 or 5, and most will be stuck with the
> really ugly women.

Luckily for Greg, they were all rounded up and shipped to New Zealand.

--
Chris F.
Long Island.

"America has spoken. The rest of the world should listen," - Tony Blair.

From:	Gregory Procter
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:43:41 +1300

America the Beautiful wrote:

> Andrealphus wrote:
>
> > Gregory Procter wrote:
> >
> >>cliff84373@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I
> >>>the only one who's tired of competing with women and other
> >>>minorities for jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
> >>>
> >>>I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
> >>>and let them go out and earn the money.
> >>
> >>Where are all these extra women going to come from?
> >
> >
> > You compete for them. Looks, $$, etc... just like they did in ancient
> > times. Not everyone is going to get 4 or 5, and most will be stuck with the
> > really ugly women.
>
> Luckily for Greg, they were all rounded up and shipped to New Zealand.

How did your mother escape?

From:	America the Beautiful
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Fri, 21 Jan 2005 07:31:07 -0500

Gregory Procter wrote:

>
> America the Beautiful wrote:
>
>
>>Andrealphus wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>cliff84373@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I
>>>>>the only one who's tired of competing with women and other
>>>>>minorities for jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
>>>>>
>>>>>I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
>>>>>and let them go out and earn the money.
>>>>
>>>>Where are all these extra women going to come from?
>>>
>>>
>>>You compete for them. Looks, $$, etc... just like they did in ancient
>>>times. Not everyone is going to get 4 or 5, and most will be stuck with the
>>>really ugly women.
>>
>>Luckily for Greg, they were all rounded up and shipped to New Zealand.
>
>
> How did your mother escape?

Escape from NY? Moving van.

--
Chris F.
Long Island.

"America has spoken. The rest of the world should listen," - Tony Blair.

From:	No One
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Fri, 21 Jan 2005 02:28:27 GMT

Gregory Procter writes:

> cliff84373@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
>
> > What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I the
> > only one who's tired of competing with women and other minorities for
> > jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
> >
> > I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
> > and let them go out and earn the money.
>
> Where are all these extra women going to come from?

Same place they came from in the Bible. With all the fighting back
then, they probably lost a lot of guys, causing a surplus of
women. Bush is doing his best to fix that by getting us in a
perpetual war, and the enemy seems to be adapting to our high
tech weapons (they just figured out how to blow up some armored
vehicles, according to recent press reports.)

That's one of the negatives Bushies won't talk about. By exposing our
high tech capabilities, we are giving the "bad guys" a perfect
opportunity to learn by trial and error, just as bacteria are learning
to live with antibiotics.

From:	Gregory Procter
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Sat, 22 Jan 2005 17:23:54 +1300

No One wrote:

> Gregory Procter writes:
>
> > cliff84373@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> >
> > > What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I the
> > > only one who's tired of competing with women and other minorities for
> > > jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
> > >
> > > I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
> > > and let them go out and earn the money.
> >
> > Where are all these extra women going to come from?
>
> Same place they came from in the Bible. With all the fighting back
> then, they probably lost a lot of guys, causing a surplus of
> women. Bush is doing his best to fix that by getting us in a
> perpetual war, and the enemy seems to be adapting to our high
> tech weapons (they just figured out how to blow up some armored
> vehicles, according to recent press reports.)

You're killing about equal numbers of men, women and children - probably more
children admittedly - so that theory isn't going to work.

>
>
> That's one of the negatives Bushies won't talk about. By exposing our
> high tech capabilities, we are giving the "bad guys" a perfect
> opportunity to learn by trial and error, just as bacteria are learning
> to live with antibiotics.

Don't worry about that, the yanks are the bacteria, and your "bad guys" are the
antibiotics. Your problem (to continue the analogy) is that developing new
strains of your bacteria costs huge amounts
and your economy is nearing meltdown point.

Regards,
Greg.P.

From:	No One
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Sat, 22 Jan 2005 04:56:35 GMT

Gregory Procter writes:

> No One wrote:
>
> > Same place they came from in the Bible. With all the fighting back
> > then, they probably lost a lot of guys, causing a surplus of
> > women. Bush is doing his best to fix that by getting us in a
> > perpetual war, and the enemy seems to be adapting to our high
> > tech weapons (they just figured out how to blow up some armored
> > vehicles, according to recent press reports.)
>
> You're killing about equal numbers of men, women and children - probably more
> children admittedly - so that theory isn't going to work.

They didn't kill the women. They raped them. :-( Remember, this was
at the time you stormed a city with battering rams and broke down the
gate. If you were on the winning side, you got to loot the city and
take advantage of the women.

> > That's one of the negatives Bushies won't talk about. By exposing our
> > high tech capabilities, we are giving the "bad guys" a perfect
> > opportunity to learn by trial and error, just as bacteria are learning
> > to live with antibiotics.
>
> Don't worry about that, the yanks are the bacteria, and your "bad
> guys" are the antibiotics. Your problem (to continue the analogy) is
> that developing new strains of your bacteria costs huge amounts and
> your economy is nearing meltdown point.

Actually, it is a good analogy - the analogy between the "terrorists"
and the bacteria is that both have no economic resources and simply
adapt to conditions. The U.S., by contrast, spends huge amounts of
money on technology (antibiotics to fight bacteria and various gizmos
to go after or fend off "terrorists"/"freedom fighters"/"the
resistance"/etc. What you call them depends on what side you are on.

The confusion is due to the fact that the bacteria are not really
bad (although we may think they are.) Bacteria simply exist and
do their own thing without regard to us.

But, hey, don't blame me. I live in a "blue" state, (and one of the
most liberal parts of the U.S.) Around here, Bush couldn't be
elected dog catcher.

From:	Greg.P.
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:34:36 +1300

No One wrote:

> Gregory Procter writes:
>
> > No One wrote:
> >
> > > Same place they came from in the Bible. With all the fighting back
> > > then, they probably lost a lot of guys, causing a surplus of
> > > women. Bush is doing his best to fix that by getting us in a
> > > perpetual war, and the enemy seems to be adapting to our high
> > > tech weapons (they just figured out how to blow up some armored
> > > vehicles, according to recent press reports.)
> >
> > You're killing about equal numbers of men, women and children - probably more
> > children admittedly - so that theory isn't going to work.
>
> They didn't kill the women. They raped them. :-( Remember, this was
> at the time you stormed a city with battering rams and broke down the
> gate. If you were on the winning side, you got to loot the city and
> take advantage of the women.

Oh, you're still in Biblical mode!

>
>
> > > That's one of the negatives Bushies won't talk about. By exposing our
> > > high tech capabilities, we are giving the "bad guys" a perfect
> > > opportunity to learn by trial and error, just as bacteria are learning
> > > to live with antibiotics.
> >
> > Don't worry about that, the yanks are the bacteria, and your "bad
> > guys" are the antibiotics. Your problem (to continue the analogy) is
> > that developing new strains of your bacteria costs huge amounts and
> > your economy is nearing meltdown point.
>
> Actually, it is a good analogy - the analogy between the "terrorists"
> and the bacteria is that both have no economic resources and simply
> adapt to conditions.

The US is quite well off - what are you talking about - you are the invaders. (aka
"Terrorists")

> The U.S., by contrast, spends huge amounts of
> money on technology (antibiotics to fight bacteria and various gizmos
> to go after or fend off "terrorists"/"freedom fighters"/"the
> resistance"/etc. What you call them depends on what side you are on.

Nahh, you are the invaders/terrorists - that's what bacteria do too!

>
>
> The confusion is due to the fact that the bacteria are not really
> bad (although we may think they are.) Bacteria simply exist and
> do their own thing without regard to us.

Yupp, that's definitely the USa. (except for the not being bad bit)

>
>
> But, hey, don't blame me. I live in a "blue" state, (and one of the
> most liberal parts of the U.S.) Around here, Bush couldn't be
> elected dog catcher.

You're still using wode???

From:	Roedy Green
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Fri, 21 Jan 2005 07:20:39 GMT

Why not polygamy? Because polygamy is much closer to mixed-
marriage than couple marriage. Having mixed- marriage legal
has not made it any easier for groups such an the LDS church to get
polygamy made legal. So it is even less likely that making same
couples legal will aid the polygamy case.

And finally, why are you so keen on blocking polygamy or polyandry?
What business it is of yours?

Bush has kiddie rape videos made at Abu Ghraib.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20040717-082858-3675r.htm
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
See http://mindprod.com/iraq.html photos of Bush's war crimes

From:	the guvner
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:44:53 GMT

On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:44:15 +1300, Gregory Procter
wrote:

>> What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I the
>> only one who's tired of competing with women and other minorities for
>> jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
>>
>> I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
>> and let them go out and earn the money.
>
>Where are all these extra women going to come from?

They can split up big fat ones like Fat Sarah.

From:	Gregory Procter
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:51:39 +1300

the guvner wrote:

> On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:44:15 +1300, Gregory Procter
> wrote:
>
> >> What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I the
> >> only one who's tired of competing with women and other minorities for
> >> jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
> >>
> >> I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
> >> and let them go out and earn the money.
> >
> >Where are all these extra women going to come from?
>
> They can split up big fat ones like Fat Sarah.

Sometimes I wish I didn't read your comments - that image is truely horrific!

From:	America the Beautiful
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 07:28:57 -0500

Gregory Procter wrote:

>
> the guvner wrote:
>
>
>>On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:44:15 +1300, Gregory Procter
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I the
>>>>only one who's tired of competing with women and other minorities for
>>>>jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
>>>>
>>>>I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
>>>>and let them go out and earn the money.
>>>
>>>Where are all these extra women going to come from?
>>
>>They can split up big fat ones like Fat Sarah.
>
>
> Sometimes I wish I didn't read your comments

I don't blame you.

> - that image is truely horrific!

The mental image that Nick is almost as fat as you?

--
Chris F.
Long Island.

"America has spoken. The rest of the world should listen," - Tony Blair.

From:	Gregory Procter
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:44:58 +1300

America the Beautiful wrote:

> Gregory Procter wrote:
>
> >
> > the guvner wrote:
> >
> >
> >>On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:44:15 +1300, Gregory Procter
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>>What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I the
> >>>>only one who's tired of competing with women and other minorities for
> >>>>jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
> >>>>
> >>>>I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
> >>>>and let them go out and earn the money.
> >>>
> >>>Where are all these extra women going to come from?
> >>
> >>They can split up big fat ones like Fat Sarah.
> >
> >
> > Sometimes I wish I didn't read your comments
>
> I don't blame you.
>
> > - that image is truely horrific!
>
> The mental image that Nick is almost as fat as you?

Nahh, the mental image of your fat head with nothing in it!

From:	America the Beautiful
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Fri, 21 Jan 2005 07:22:23 -0500

Gregory Procter wrote:

>
> America the Beautiful wrote:
>
>
>>Gregory Procter wrote:
>>
>>
>>>the guvner wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:44:15 +1300, Gregory Procter
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I the
>>>>>>only one who's tired of competing with women and other minorities for
>>>>>>jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
>>>>>>and let them go out and earn the money.
>>>>>
>>>>>Where are all these extra women going to come from?
>>>>
>>>>They can split up big fat ones like Fat Sarah.
>>>
>>>
>>>Sometimes I wish I didn't read your comments
>>
>>I don't blame you.
>>
>>
>>>- that image is truely horrific!
>>
>>The mental image that Nick is almost as fat as you?
>
>
> Nahh, the mental image of your fat head with nothing in it!

You're worried that if you eat my head there won't be any tasty brain
inside? Have no fear - there is plenty for the whole family.

--
Chris F.
Long Island.

"America has spoken. The rest of the world should listen," - Tony Blair.

From:	Gregory Procter
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Sat, 22 Jan 2005 17:29:07 +1300

America the Beautiful wrote:

> Gregory Procter wrote:
>
> >
> > America the Beautiful wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Gregory Procter wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>the guvner wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:44:15 +1300, Gregory Procter
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I the
> >>>>>>only one who's tired of competing with women and other minorities for
> >>>>>>jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
> >>>>>>and let them go out and earn the money.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Where are all these extra women going to come from?
> >>>>
> >>>>They can split up big fat ones like Fat Sarah.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Sometimes I wish I didn't read your comments
> >>
> >>I don't blame you.
> >>
> >>
> >>>- that image is truely horrific!
> >>
> >>The mental image that Nick is almost as fat as you?
> >
> >
> > Nahh, the mental image of your fat head with nothing in it!
>
> You're worried that if you eat my head there won't be any tasty brain
> inside? Have no fear - there is plenty for the whole family.
>

You hide it very well, any onlooker would think you had none!

>
> --
> Chris F.
> Long Island.
>
> "America has spoken. The rest of the world should listen," - Tony Blair.

From:	America the Beautiful
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:39:52 -0500

Gregory Procter wrote:

>
> America the Beautiful wrote:
>
>
>>Gregory Procter wrote:
>>
>>
>>>America the Beautiful wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>the guvner wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:44:15 +1300, Gregory Procter
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I the
>>>>>>>>only one who's tired of competing with women and other minorities for
>>>>>>>>jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
>>>>>>>>and let them go out and earn the money.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Where are all these extra women going to come from?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>They can split up big fat ones like Fat Sarah.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Sometimes I wish I didn't read your comments
>>>>
>>>>I don't blame you.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>- that image is truely horrific!
>>>>
>>>>The mental image that Nick is almost as fat as you?
>>>
>>>
>>>Nahh, the mental image of your fat head with nothing in it!
>>
>>You're worried that if you eat my head there won't be any tasty brain
>>inside? Have no fear - there is plenty for the whole family.
>>
>
>
> You hide it very well, any onlooker would think you had none!

I hide it cause I'm afraid I'll meet a half German - half Maori Kiwi
that would want to boil my brains with carrots and celery.

--
Chris F.
Long Island.

"America has spoken. The rest of the world should listen," - Tony Blair.

From:	Andrealphus
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 02:01:57 GMT

America the Beautiful wrote:
> Gregory Procter wrote:
>
>>
>> America the Beautiful wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Gregory Procter wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> America the Beautiful wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Gregory Procter wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> the guvner wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:44:15 +1300, Gregory Procter
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the
>>>>>>>>> Bible. Am I the only one who's tired of competing with women
>>>>>>>>> and other minorities for jobs when they have affirmative
>>>>>>>>> action and we don't?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in
>>>>>>>>> the Bible and let them go out and earn the money.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Where are all these extra women going to come from?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They can split up big fat ones like Fat Sarah.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sometimes I wish I didn't read your comments
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't blame you.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> - that image is truely horrific!
>>>>>
>>>>> The mental image that Nick is almost as fat as you?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nahh, the mental image of your fat head with nothing in it!
>>>
>>> You're worried that if you eat my head there won't be any tasty
>>> brain inside? Have no fear - there is plenty for the whole family.
>>>
>>
>>
>> You hide it very well, any onlooker would think you had none!
>
> I hide it cause I'm afraid I'll meet a half German - half Maori Kiwi
> that would want to boil my brains with carrots and celery.

That's not possible for obvious reasons. :c)

--
"Only Buddhism is compatible with science. It covers the smallest
particles to the largest creations of the cosmos. It is the only
religion capable of scientific truth."

Albert Einstein

From:	Greg.Procter
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:27:12 +1300

America the Beautiful wrote:

> Gregory Procter wrote:
>
> >
> > America the Beautiful wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Gregory Procter wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>America the Beautiful wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>the guvner wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:44:15 +1300, Gregory Procter
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I the
> >>>>>>>>only one who's tired of competing with women and other minorities for
> >>>>>>>>jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
> >>>>>>>>and let them go out and earn the money.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Where are all these extra women going to come from?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>They can split up big fat ones like Fat Sarah.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Sometimes I wish I didn't read your comments
> >>>>
> >>>>I don't blame you.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>- that image is truely horrific!
> >>>>
> >>>>The mental image that Nick is almost as fat as you?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Nahh, the mental image of your fat head with nothing in it!
> >>
> >>You're worried that if you eat my head there won't be any tasty brain
> >>inside? Have no fear - there is plenty for the whole family.
> >>
> >
> >
> > You hide it very well, any onlooker would think you had none!
>
> I hide it cause I'm afraid I'll meet a half German - half Maori Kiwi
> that would want to boil my brains with carrots and celery.

No problem - the vegetable is pouha, or in your case (recipe) pakeha.

From:	America the Beautiful
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Sat, 22 Jan 2005 22:43:18 -0500

Greg.Procter wrote:

>
> America the Beautiful wrote:
>
>
>>Gregory Procter wrote:
>>
>>
>>>America the Beautiful wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>America the Beautiful wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>the guvner wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:44:15 +1300, Gregory Procter
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I the
>>>>>>>>>>only one who's tired of competing with women and other minorities for
>>>>>>>>>>jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
>>>>>>>>>>and let them go out and earn the money.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Where are all these extra women going to come from?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>They can split up big fat ones like Fat Sarah.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Sometimes I wish I didn't read your comments
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I don't blame you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>- that image is truely horrific!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The mental image that Nick is almost as fat as you?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Nahh, the mental image of your fat head with nothing in it!
>>>>
>>>>You're worried that if you eat my head there won't be any tasty brain
>>>>inside? Have no fear - there is plenty for the whole family.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>You hide it very well, any onlooker would think you had none!
>>
>>I hide it cause I'm afraid I'll meet a half German - half Maori Kiwi
>>that would want to boil my brains with carrots and celery.
>
>
> No problem - the vegetable is pouha, or in your case (recipe) pakeha.

I don't know what that is but I'm sure it's better then carrats.

--
Chris F.
Long Island.

"America has spoken. The rest of the world should listen," - Tony Blair.

From:	the guvner
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 22:27:29 GMT

On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 07:28:57 -0500, America the Beautiful
wrote:

>
>
>Gregory Procter wrote:
>
>>
>> the guvner wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:44:15 +1300, Gregory Procter
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I the
>>>>>only one who's tired of competing with women and other minorities for
>>>>>jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
>>>>>
>>>>>I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
>>>>>and let them go out and earn the money.
>>>>
>>>>Where are all these extra women going to come from?
>>>
>>>They can split up big fat ones like Fat Sarah.
>>
>>
>> Sometimes I wish I didn't read your comments
>
>I don't blame you.
>
>> - that image is truely horrific!
>
>The mental image that Nick is almost as fat as you?

Phat as you...

From:	America the Beautiful
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Fri, 21 Jan 2005 06:40:31 -0500

the guvner wrote:

> On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 07:28:57 -0500, America the Beautiful
> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>Gregory Procter wrote:
>>
>>
>>>the guvner wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:44:15 +1300, Gregory Procter
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I the
>>>>>>only one who's tired of competing with women and other minorities for
>>>>>>jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
>>>>>>and let them go out and earn the money.
>>>>>
>>>>>Where are all these extra women going to come from?
>>>>
>>>>They can split up big fat ones like Fat Sarah.
>>>
>>>
>>>Sometimes I wish I didn't read your comments
>>
>>I don't blame you.
>>
>>
>>>- that image is truely horrific!
>>
>>The mental image that Nick is almost as fat as you?
>
>
> Phat as you...

You're not as phat as me, but you're fatter then me. A lot fatter.
Almost greglike.

--
Chris F.
Long Island.

"America has spoken. The rest of the world should listen," - Tony Blair.

From:	the guvner
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Fri, 21 Jan 2005 17:28:01 GMT

On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 06:40:31 -0500, America the Beautiful
wrote:

>>>The mental image that Nick is almost as fat as you?
>>
>>
>> Phat as you...
>
>You're not as phat as me, but you're fatter then me. A lot fatter.
>Almost greglike.

I'm thin, innit.

From:	America the Beautiful
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 06:48:33 -0500

Gregory Procter wrote:

>
> cliff84373@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
>
>
>>What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I the
>>only one who's tired of competing with women and other minorities for
>>jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
>>
>>I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
>>and let them go out and earn the money.
>
>
> Where are all these extra women going to come from?

Maybe from NZ. They're ugly but they give great head.

--
Chris F.
Long Island.

"America has spoken. The rest of the world should listen," - Tony Blair.

From:	the guvner
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:48:52 GMT

On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 06:48:33 -0500, America the Beautiful
wrote:

>>>What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I the
>>>only one who's tired of competing with women and other minorities for
>>>jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
>>>
>>>I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
>>>and let them go out and earn the money.
>>
>>
>> Where are all these extra women going to come from?
>
>Maybe from NZ. They're ugly but they give great head.

That was a sheep.

From:	America the Beautiful
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 07:42:27 -0500

the guvner wrote:

> On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 06:48:33 -0500, America the Beautiful
> wrote:
>
>
>>>>What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I the
>>>>only one who's tired of competing with women and other minorities for
>>>>jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
>>>>
>>>>I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
>>>>and let them go out and earn the money.
>>>
>>>
>>>Where are all these extra women going to come from?
>>
>>Maybe from NZ. They're ugly but they give great head.
>
>
> That was a sheep.

Boy, am I lucky it wasn't a goat!!

--
Chris F.
Long Island.

"America has spoken. The rest of the world should listen," - Tony Blair.

From:	the guvner
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 22:00:44 GMT

On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 07:42:27 -0500, America the Beautiful
wrote:

>>>>>What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I the
>>>>>only one who's tired of competing with women and other minorities for
>>>>>jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
>>>>>
>>>>>I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
>>>>>and let them go out and earn the money.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Where are all these extra women going to come from?
>>>
>>>Maybe from NZ. They're ugly but they give great head.
>>
>>
>> That was a sheep.
>
>Boy, am I lucky it wasn't a goat!!

Or a ram...

From:	America the Beautiful
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Fri, 21 Jan 2005 07:28:39 -0500

the guvner wrote:

> On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 07:42:27 -0500, America the Beautiful
> wrote:
>
>
>>>>>>What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I the
>>>>>>only one who's tired of competing with women and other minorities for
>>>>>>jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
>>>>>>and let them go out and earn the money.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Where are all these extra women going to come from?
>>>>
>>>>Maybe from NZ. They're ugly but they give great head.
>>>
>>>
>>>That was a sheep.
>>
>>Boy, am I lucky it wasn't a goat!!
>
>
> Or a ram...

A ram is a sheep. Blowjobs from sheep are still legal in NZ.

--
Chris F.
Long Island.

"America has spoken. The rest of the world should listen," - Tony Blair.

From:	the guvner
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Fri, 21 Jan 2005 17:22:24 GMT

On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 07:28:39 -0500, America the Beautiful
wrote:

>>>>>Maybe from NZ. They're ugly but they give great head.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>That was a sheep.
>>>
>>>Boy, am I lucky it wasn't a goat!!
>>
>>
>> Or a ram...
>
>A ram is a sheep. Blowjobs from sheep are still legal in NZ.

You didn't get arrested then?

From:	Gregory Procter
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:54:52 +1300

the guvner wrote:

> On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 06:48:33 -0500, America the Beautiful
> wrote:
>
> >>>What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I the
> >>>only one who's tired of competing with women and other minorities for
> >>>jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
> >>>
> >>>I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
> >>>and let them go out and earn the money.
> >>
> >>
> >> Where are all these extra women going to come from?
> >
> >Maybe from NZ. They're ugly but they give great head.
>
> That was a sheep.

Chris told me he thinks our sheep are exceptionally pretty!
(you can't trust a thing he says!)

From:	the guvner
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:51:56 GMT

On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:54:52 +1300, Gregory Procter
wrote:

>> >>>What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I the
>> >>>only one who's tired of competing with women and other minorities for
>> >>>jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
>> >>>
>> >>>I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
>> >>>and let them go out and earn the money.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Where are all these extra women going to come from?
>> >
>> >Maybe from NZ. They're ugly but they give great head.
>>
>> That was a sheep.
>
>Chris told me he thinks our sheep are exceptionally pretty!

Compared to fat American women anything is nice looking.

>(you can't trust a thing he says!)
>

From:	America the Beautiful
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 07:38:12 -0500

the guvner wrote:

> On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:54:52 +1300, Gregory Procter
> wrote:
>
>
>>>>>>What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I the
>>>>>>only one who's tired of competing with women and other minorities for
>>>>>>jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
>>>>>>and let them go out and earn the money.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Where are all these extra women going to come from?
>>>>
>>>>Maybe from NZ. They're ugly but they give great head.
>>>
>>>That was a sheep.
>>
>>Chris told me he thinks our sheep are exceptionally pretty!
>
>
> Compared to fat American women anything is nice looking.

Sure - like this great piece of ass.

http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/hottie.jpg

>>(you can't trust a thing he says!)
>>
>
>

--
Chris F.
Long Island.

"America has spoken. The rest of the world should listen," - Tony Blair.

From:	the guvner
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 22:00:19 GMT

On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 07:38:12 -0500, America the Beautiful
wrote:

>> Compared to fat American women anything is nice looking.
>
>Sure - like this great piece of ass.
>
>http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/hottie.jpg

Meanwhile in America:

http://www.thesylvaherald.com/B-Croft032802.htm

From:	Gregory Procter
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:57:58 +1300

the guvner wrote:

> On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:54:52 +1300, Gregory Procter
> wrote:
>
> >> >>>What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I the
> >> >>>only one who's tired of competing with women and other minorities for
> >> >>>jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
> >> >>>
> >> >>>I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
> >> >>>and let them go out and earn the money.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Where are all these extra women going to come from?
> >> >
> >> >Maybe from NZ. They're ugly but they give great head.
> >>
> >> That was a sheep.
> >
> >Chris told me he thinks our sheep are exceptionally pretty!
>
> Compared to fat American women anything is nice looking.

Neither sheep nor US women have any appeal to me. You can't ever shear US women!

>
>
> >(you can't trust a thing he says!)
> >

From:	America the Beautiful
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Thu, 20 Jan 2005 07:32:59 -0500

Gregory Procter wrote:

>
> the guvner wrote:
>
>
>>On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:54:52 +1300, Gregory Procter
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>>>>What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I the
>>>>>>>only one who's tired of competing with women and other minorities for
>>>>>>>jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
>>>>>>>and let them go out and earn the money.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Where are all these extra women going to come from?
>>>>>
>>>>>Maybe from NZ. They're ugly but they give great head.
>>>>
>>>>That was a sheep.
>>>
>>>Chris told me he thinks our sheep are exceptionally pretty!
>>
>>Compared to fat American women anything is nice looking.
>
>
> Neither sheep nor US women have any appeal to me. You can't ever shear US women!

You don't need too, they're hairless from the neck down. Tasty.

>>>(you can't trust a thing he says!)
>>>
>
>

--
Chris F.
Long Island.

"America has spoken. The rest of the world should listen," - Tony Blair.

From:	Gregory Procter
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:38:17 +1300

America the Beautiful wrote:

> Gregory Procter wrote:
>
> >
> > the guvner wrote:
> >
> >
> >>On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:54:52 +1300, Gregory Procter
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>>>>>What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I the
> >>>>>>>only one who's tired of competing with women and other minorities for
> >>>>>>>jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
> >>>>>>>and let them go out and earn the money.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Where are all these extra women going to come from?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Maybe from NZ. They're ugly but they give great head.
> >>>>
> >>>>That was a sheep.
> >>>
> >>>Chris told me he thinks our sheep are exceptionally pretty!
> >>
> >>Compared to fat American women anything is nice looking.
> >
> >
> > Neither sheep nor US women have any appeal to me. You can't ever shear US women!
>
> You don't need too, they're hairless from the neck down. Tasty.

I prefer mine to have reached puberty!

From:	America the Beautiful
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Fri, 21 Jan 2005 06:44:41 -0500

Gregory Procter wrote:

>
> America the Beautiful wrote:
>
>
>>Gregory Procter wrote:
>>
>>
>>>the guvner wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:54:52 +1300, Gregory Procter
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I the
>>>>>>>>>only one who's tired of competing with women and other minorities for
>>>>>>>>>jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
>>>>>>>>>and let them go out and earn the money.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Where are all these extra women going to come from?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Maybe from NZ. They're ugly but they give great head.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>That was a sheep.
>>>>>
>>>>>Chris told me he thinks our sheep are exceptionally pretty!
>>>>
>>>>Compared to fat American women anything is nice looking.
>>>
>>>
>>>Neither sheep nor US women have any appeal to me. You can't ever shear US women!
>>
>>You don't need too, they're hairless from the neck down. Tasty.
>
>
> I prefer mine to have reached puberty!

I've never doubted it but I hope so, Greg. Now try getting these older
women to shave their junk.

--
Chris F.
Long Island.

"America has spoken. The rest of the world should listen," - Tony Blair.

From:	Gregory Procter
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Sat, 22 Jan 2005 17:33:15 +1300

America the Beautiful wrote:

> Gregory Procter wrote:
>
> >
> > America the Beautiful wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Gregory Procter wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>the guvner wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:54:52 +1300, Gregory Procter
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I the
> >>>>>>>>>only one who's tired of competing with women and other minorities for
> >>>>>>>>>jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
> >>>>>>>>>and let them go out and earn the money.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Where are all these extra women going to come from?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Maybe from NZ. They're ugly but they give great head.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>That was a sheep.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Chris told me he thinks our sheep are exceptionally pretty!
> >>>>
> >>>>Compared to fat American women anything is nice looking.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Neither sheep nor US women have any appeal to me. You can't ever shear US women!
> >>
> >>You don't need too, they're hairless from the neck down. Tasty.
> >
> >
> > I prefer mine to have reached puberty!
>
> I've never doubted it but I hope so, Greg. Now try getting these older
> women to shave their junk.
>

If you want them to look pre-puberty then you ask them to shave.

From:	America the Beautiful
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:36:33 -0500

Gregory Procter wrote:

>
> America the Beautiful wrote:
>
>
>>Gregory Procter wrote:
>>
>>
>>>America the Beautiful wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>the guvner wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:54:52 +1300, Gregory Procter
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I the
>>>>>>>>>>>only one who's tired of competing with women and other minorities for
>>>>>>>>>>>jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
>>>>>>>>>>>and let them go out and earn the money.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Where are all these extra women going to come from?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Maybe from NZ. They're ugly but they give great head.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>That was a sheep.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Chris told me he thinks our sheep are exceptionally pretty!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Compared to fat American women anything is nice looking.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Neither sheep nor US women have any appeal to me. You can't ever shear US women!
>>>>
>>>>You don't need too, they're hairless from the neck down. Tasty.
>>>
>>>
>>>I prefer mine to have reached puberty!
>>
>>I've never doubted it but I hope so, Greg. Now try getting these older
>>women to shave their junk.
>>
>
>
> If you want them to look pre-puberty then you ask them to shave.

No, Greg, it you don't want hair in your throat you ask them to shave.
Surly you don't want hair in your throat, do you?

--
Chris F.
Long Island.

"America has spoken. The rest of the world should listen," - Tony Blair.

From:	Greg.Procter
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:23:57 +1300

America the Beautiful wrote:

> Gregory Procter wrote:
>
> >
> > America the Beautiful wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Gregory Procter wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>America the Beautiful wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>the guvner wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:54:52 +1300, Gregory Procter
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I the
> >>>>>>>>>>>only one who's tired of competing with women and other minorities for
> >>>>>>>>>>>jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
> >>>>>>>>>>>and let them go out and earn the money.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>Where are all these extra women going to come from?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>Maybe from NZ. They're ugly but they give great head.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>That was a sheep.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Chris told me he thinks our sheep are exceptionally pretty!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Compared to fat American women anything is nice looking.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Neither sheep nor US women have any appeal to me. You can't ever shear US women!
> >>>>
> >>>>You don't need too, they're hairless from the neck down. Tasty.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>I prefer mine to have reached puberty!
> >>
> >>I've never doubted it but I hope so, Greg. Now try getting these older
> >>women to shave their junk.
> >>
> >
> >
> > If you want them to look pre-puberty then you ask them to shave.
>
> No, Greg, it you don't want hair in your throat you ask them to shave.
> Surly you don't want hair in your throat, do you?

I'm not a chinless wonder like you, Chris.

>
>
> --
> Chris F.
> Long Island.
>
> "America has spoken. The rest of the world should listen," - Tony Blair.

From:	America the Beautiful
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Sat, 22 Jan 2005 22:37:31 -0500

Greg.Procter wrote:
>
> America the Beautiful wrote:
>
>
>>Gregory Procter wrote:
>>
>>
>>>America the Beautiful wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>America the Beautiful wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>the guvner wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:54:52 +1300, Gregory Procter
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>only one who's tired of competing with women and other minorities for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
>>>>>>>>>>>>>and let them go out and earn the money.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Where are all these extra women going to come from?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Maybe from NZ. They're ugly but they give great head.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>That was a sheep.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Chris told me he thinks our sheep are exceptionally pretty!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Compared to fat American women anything is nice looking.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Neither sheep nor US women have any appeal to me. You can't ever shear US women!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You don't need too, they're hairless from the neck down. Tasty.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I prefer mine to have reached puberty!
>>>>
>>>>I've never doubted it but I hope so, Greg. Now try getting these older
>>>>women to shave their junk.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>If you want them to look pre-puberty then you ask them to shave.
>>
>>No, Greg, it you don't want hair in your throat you ask them to shave.
>>Surly you don't want hair in your throat, do you?
>
>
> I'm not a chinless wonder like you, Chris.

WTF does that mean?

--
Chris F.
Long Island.

"America has spoken. The rest of the world should listen," - Tony Blair.

From:	Gregory Procter
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Mon, 24 Jan 2005 08:58:17 +1300

America the Beautiful wrote:

> Greg.Procter wrote:
> >
> > America the Beautiful wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Gregory Procter wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>America the Beautiful wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>America the Beautiful wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>the guvner wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:54:52 +1300, Gregory Procter
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>only one who's tired of competing with women and other minorities for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>and let them go out and earn the money.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>Where are all these extra women going to come from?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>Maybe from NZ. They're ugly but they give great head.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>That was a sheep.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>Chris told me he thinks our sheep are exceptionally pretty!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Compared to fat American women anything is nice looking.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Neither sheep nor US women have any appeal to me. You can't ever shear US women!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>You don't need too, they're hairless from the neck down. Tasty.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>I prefer mine to have reached puberty!
> >>>>
> >>>>I've never doubted it but I hope so, Greg. Now try getting these older
> >>>>women to shave their junk.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>If you want them to look pre-puberty then you ask them to shave.
> >>
> >>No, Greg, it you don't want hair in your throat you ask them to shave.
> >>Surly you don't want hair in your throat, do you?
> >
> >
> > I'm not a chinless wonder like you, Chris.
>
> WTF does that mean?

It means I have a whole volume of anatomy to catch those curly bits before they get to my
throat, Chris.

From:	America the Beautiful
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:48:25 -0500

Gregory Procter wrote:

>
> America the Beautiful wrote:
>
>
>>Greg.Procter wrote:
>>
>>>America the Beautiful wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>America the Beautiful wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>America the Beautiful wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>the guvner wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:54:52 +1300, Gregory Procter
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>only one who's tired of competing with women and other minorities for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>and let them go out and earn the money.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Where are all these extra women going to come from?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Maybe from NZ. They're ugly but they give great head.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>That was a sheep.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Chris told me he thinks our sheep are exceptionally pretty!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Compared to fat American women anything is nice looking.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Neither sheep nor US women have any appeal to me. You can't ever shear US women!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>You don't need too, they're hairless from the neck down. Tasty.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I prefer mine to have reached puberty!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I've never doubted it but I hope so, Greg. Now try getting these older
>>>>>>women to shave their junk.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>If you want them to look pre-puberty then you ask them to shave.
>>>>
>>>>No, Greg, it you don't want hair in your throat you ask them to shave.
>>>>Surly you don't want hair in your throat, do you?
>>>
>>>
>>>I'm not a chinless wonder like you, Chris.
>>
>>WTF does that mean?
>
>
> It means I have a whole volume of anatomy to catch those curly bits before they get to my
> throat, Chris.

Oh I get it now, you've never "waxed the floor". I've heard that NZ
women have a odoriferous hygienic problem. Must be the lack of quality
education about cleanliness.

--
Chris F.
Long Island.

"America has spoken. The rest of the world should listen," - Tony Blair.

From:	Gregory Procter
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:04:15 +1300

America the Beautiful wrote:

> Gregory Procter wrote:
>
> >
> > America the Beautiful wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Greg.Procter wrote:
> >>
> >>>America the Beautiful wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>America the Beautiful wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>America the Beautiful wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>the guvner wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:54:52 +1300, Gregory Procter
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>What's wrong with polygamy? They used to have it in the Bible. Am I the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>only one who's tired of competing with women and other minorities for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>and let them go out and earn the money.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Where are all these extra women going to come from?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Maybe from NZ. They're ugly but they give great head.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>That was a sheep.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>Chris told me he thinks our sheep are exceptionally pretty!
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>Compared to fat American women anything is nice looking.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>Neither sheep nor US women have any appeal to me. You can't ever shear US women!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>You don't need too, they're hairless from the neck down. Tasty.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>I prefer mine to have reached puberty!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>I've never doubted it but I hope so, Greg. Now try getting these older
> >>>>>>women to shave their junk.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>If you want them to look pre-puberty then you ask them to shave.
> >>>>
> >>>>No, Greg, it you don't want hair in your throat you ask them to shave.
> >>>>Surly you don't want hair in your throat, do you?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>I'm not a chinless wonder like you, Chris.
> >>
> >>WTF does that mean?
> >
> >
> > It means I have a whole volume of anatomy to catch those curly bits before they get to my
> > throat, Chris.
>
> Oh I get it now, you've never "waxed the floor". I've heard that NZ
> women have a odoriferous hygienic problem. Must be the lack of quality
> education about cleanliness.

You've got the wrong country and no experience.

From:	Ted Danson
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:40:25 -0700

America the Beautiful wrote:
>

>>
>>
>> I'm not a chinless wonder like you, Chris.
>
>
> WTF does that mean?

It means he has chins to spare.

From:	America the Beautiful
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Sat, 22 Jan 2005 22:44:38 -0500

Ted Danson wrote:

> America the Beautiful wrote:
>
>>
>
>
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm not a chinless wonder like you, Chris.
>>
>>
>>
>> WTF does that mean?
>
>
> It means he has chins to spare.

That's what I thought he meant.

--
Chris F.
Long Island.

"America has spoken. The rest of the world should listen," - Tony Blair.

From:	occupant
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 02:24:08 GMT

> What's wrong with polygamy?

Depends if you are a woman or a guy. For a guy it is a dream at the
moment because there is no legislation regarding polygamy. But if
polygamy legislation is granted in the same way as same marriage
laws,
Husbands will have to pay support for each offspring they produce and
divide his assets, house whatever with two women instead of one. So for
guys it is a mixed bag.

Most women reject most men until the find the right man. To think that
any woman in any culture wants to share him with another women more
beautiful, younger, smarter and more charming, may be questionable.

> They used to have it in the Bible. Am I the
> only one who's tired of competing with women and other minorities for
> jobs when they have affirmative action and we don't?

Well, what jobs are you competing for? Most of the jobs for most of the
women I know don't have benefits, pensions, and the greatest
opportunities for advancement.

> I say let's marry 4 or 5 woman, treat them like they did in the Bible
> and let them go out and earn the money.

But in Bible times they wore loin clothes and fig leaves and neither the
guys or the women were that smart or
enlightened.

> Where are all these extra women going to come from?

Hey, bud to to any church in any country and there will be lots and lots
of women looking for guys to marry them and have their babies. No
shortage of women in churches. Go look.

> Maybe from NZ. They're ugly but they give great head.
> That was a sheep.

Women don't care how ugly they are. They know that when you want them
you will give them almost anything they want - time and time again.

So in reality men are the sheep. They follow women around until they
say yes.

>Chris told me he thinks our sheep are exceptionally pretty!

> Compared to fat American women anything is nice looking.

American women have the greatest freedom and live in the richest country
in the world and the men
of the world are something less than that. Does these full-bodied women
care? Ask them.

From:	Susan Cohen
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 04:28:25 GMT

"occupant" wrote in message
news:41F30A3E.5138538A@telus.net...
>> What's wrong with polygamy?
>
> Depends if you are a woman or a guy.

One of the problems with ploygamy is everyone assuming it's the same as
"polygyny."
And no, this is *not* some sort of grammar lame.

For a guy it is a dream at the
> moment because there is no legislation regarding polygamy.

I presume you mean some country other than the US?

Susan

From:	gigo448 at netscape.net
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	23 Jan 2005 05:35:27 -0800

Andrealphus wrote:
> >>>> "Guess I'd opt for polygamy."
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> 7 wives is seven chances, duhhh!!!
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> And if ONE gets it they ALL get it KABOOM!
> >>
> >> How is one going to get it if they stay within the marriage?

That's the chance you take, you just never know, even the tests
aren't 100%

> Do
> >> you think that HIV just magically appears one day?
> >
> > Tell that to the 100's of thousands of recipients who simply
> > woke up and realized they had it one day. No matter how many
> > partners they had. EVERY person is at RISK, and IS a Risk.
>
> Nonsense. If you stay within a relationship with uninfected
people/persons,
> you are at zero risk.

Regular Eistien you are NOT! That much is extremely obvious, and even
then
not 100% correct, theirs transfusion problems, and other disease
control
related issues as well.

>
>
> You
> > are living in a dream world if you think they *magicly* aren't.
>
> Obviously, you have

i have several years worth of experience in the area of
bio-chemical contaminates. I know things, that others take for
granted. Just like what you are taking for granted any time you
increase the number of test cases from 2 to seven, in a disease
control study.

gigo

From:	Andrealphus
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:42:18 GMT

wrote in message
news:1106487327.965936.316680@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> Andrealphus wrote:
> > >>>> "Guess I'd opt for polygamy."
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> 7 wives is seven chances, duhhh!!!
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> And if ONE gets it they ALL get it KABOOM!
> > >>
> > >> How is one going to get it if they stay within the marriage?
>
> That's the chance you take, you just never know, even the tests
> aren't 100%

The point is, moron, that's the chance you take whether your in a
relationship or not. Get it? The fact is that people in a committed
relationship, whether two, or more people, are at seriously less risk than
people having anonymous .

>
> > Do
> > >> you think that HIV just magically appears one day?
> > >
> > > Tell that to the 100's of thousands of recipients who simply
> > > woke up and realized they had it one day. No matter how many
> > > partners they had. EVERY person is at RISK, and IS a Risk.
> >
> > Nonsense. If you stay within a relationship with uninfected
> people/persons,
> > you are at zero risk.
>
> Regular Eistien you are NOT! That much is extremely obvious, and even
> then
> not 100% correct, theirs transfusion problems, and other disease
> control
> related issues as well.

Riiigghhhtt... Like they don't test the blood these days... Disease
control problems? You need to be more specific.

>
> >
> >
> > You
> > > are living in a dream world if you think they *magicly* aren't.
> >
> > Obviously, you have
>
>
> i have several years

Next time, address the points I made.

--
"Only Buddhism is compatible with science. It covers the smallest particles
to the largest creations of the cosmos. It is the only religion capable of
scientific truth."

Albert Einstein