inetbot web crawler
Main  |  Get access to the repository  |  API  |  The robot  |  Publications  |  Usenet Groups  |  Plainweb  | 
 inetbot - Groups (beta)

Current group: soc.motss

Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?

Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?  
gigo448 at netscape.net
 Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?  
Andrealphus
 Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?  
gigo448 at netscape.net
 Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?  
Andrealphus
 Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?  
gigo448 at netscape.net
 Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?  
Andrealphus
From:gigo448 at netscape.net
Subject:Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:22 Jan 2005 18:26:24 -0800

occupant wrote:
> > What's wrong with polygamy?
>


Isn't HIV bad enuff without help?

Just wondering outloud..
From:Andrealphus
Subject:Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 02:31:53 GMT
gigo448@netscape.net wrote:
> occupant wrote:
>>> What's wrong with polygamy?
>>
>
>
> Isn't HIV bad enuff without help?
>
> Just wondering outloud..

How would polygamy spread HIV?

--
"Only Buddhism is compatible with science. It covers the smallest
particles to the largest creations of the cosmos. It is the only
religion capable of scientific truth."

Albert Einstein
From:gigo448 at netscape.net
Subject:Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:23 Jan 2005 05:51:01 -0800

Andrealphus wrote:
> wrote in message
> news:1106487327.965936.316680@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Andrealphus wrote:
> > > >>>> "Guess I'd opt for polygamy."
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> 7 wives is seven chances, duhhh!!!
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> And if ONE gets it they ALL get it KABOOM!
> > > >>
> > > >> How is one going to get it if they stay within the marriage?
> >
> > That's the chance you take, you just never know, even the tests
> > aren't 100%
>
> The point is, moron, that's the chance you take whether your in a
> relationship or not. Get it?

DOES NOT COMPUTE, ERROR, ERROR, REJECT, RECALCULATE, AND RELOAD
DATA DOES NOT COMPUTE!!!
"Come again, the computer is spitting you out!"


GIGO
From:Andrealphus
Subject:Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:58:46 GMT
gigo448@netscape.net wrote:
> Andrealphus wrote:
>> wrote in message
>> news:1106487327.965936.316680@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>> Andrealphus wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Guess I'd opt for polygamy."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 7 wives is seven chances, duhhh!!!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And if ONE gets it they ALL get it KABOOM!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How is one going to get it if they stay within the marriage?
>>>
>>> That's the chance you take, you just never know, even the tests
>>> aren't 100%
>>
>> The point is, moron, that's the chance you take whether your in a
>> relationship or not. Get it?
>
> DOES NOT COMPUTE,

Try more brain cells then. You may have to find more than the one or two
you have.



--
"Only Buddhism is compatible with science. It covers the smallest
particles to the largest creations of the cosmos. It is the only
religion capable of scientific truth."

Albert Einstein
From:gigo448 at netscape.net
Subject:Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:23 Jan 2005 12:37:52 -0800

Andrealphus wrote:
> Fritz wrote:
> > gigo448@netscape.net wrote:
> >
> >> Andrealphus wrote:
> >>> gigo448@netscape.net wrote:
> >>>> gigo448@netscape.net wrote:
> >>>>> Andrealphus wrote:
> >>>>>> gigo448@netscape.net wrote:
> >>>>>>> Andrealphus wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> But my common sense seems superior to yours.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> How do you suppose i arrived at my own answer? I've got
> >>>>>>>>> a Math equivalancy of ninth grade.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> That explains it then. No common sense, and no math
> >>>>>>>> abilities, perhaps you should go back to school.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Then why would you choose seven bullets to play russian
roulette
> >>>>>>> with instead of 2? I certainly wouldn't.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I am not choo
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "Guess I'd opt for polygamy."
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 7 wives is seven chances, duhhh!!!
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> And if ONE gets it they ALL get it KABOOM!
> >>>
> >>> How is one going to get it if they stay within the marriage? Do
> >>> you think that HIV just magically appears one day?
> >>
> >> Tell that to the 100's of thousands of recipients who simply
> >> woke up and realized they had it one day. No matter how many
> >> partners they had. EVERY person is at RISK, and IS a Risk. You
> >> are living in a dream world if you think they *magicly* aren't.
> >
> > What the hell are you talking about?
>
> He doesn't really know. He lost this argument several posts ago.
I'm just
> playing with him at this point.

Bugger OFF parasite, you and your delusional world.

http://www.mentalhelp.net/poc/view_doc.php/type/doc/id/419

Miserly loves company, and then they lie about it too!

bd4u


>
> --
> "Only Buddhism is compatible with science. It covers the smallest
> particles to the largest creations of the cosmos. It is the only
> religion capable of scientific truth."
>
> Albert Einstein
From:Andrealphus
Subject:Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 20:42:42 GMT
gigo448@netscape.net wrote:
> Andrealphus wrote:
>> Fritz wrote:
>>> gigo448@netscape.net wrote:
>>>
>>>> Andrealphus wrote:
>>>>> gigo448@netscape.net wrote:
>>>>>> gigo448@netscape.net wrote:
>>>>>>> Andrealphus wrote:
>>>>>>>> gigo448@netscape.net wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Andrealphus wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> But my common sense seems superior to yours.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> How do you suppose i arrived at my own answer? I've got
>>>>>>>>>>> a Math equivalancy of ninth grade.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That explains it then. No common sense, and no math
>>>>>>>>>> abilities, perhaps you should go back to school.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Then why would you choose seven bullets to play russian
>>>>>>>>> roulette with instead of 2? I certainly wouldn't.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am not choo
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Guess I'd opt for polygamy."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 7 wives is seven chances, duhhh!!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And if ONE gets it they ALL get it KABOOM!
>>>>>
>>>>> How is one going to get it if they stay within the marriage? Do
>>>>> you think that HIV just magically appears one day?
>>>>
>>>> Tell that to the 100's of thousands of recipients who simply
>>>> woke up and realized they had it one day. No matter how many
>>>> partners they had. EVERY person is at RISK, and IS a Risk. You
>>>> are living in a dream world if you think they *magicly* aren't.
>>>
>>> What the hell are you talking about?
>>
>> He doesn't really know. He lost this argument several posts ago.
>> I'm just playing with him at this point.
>
> Bugger OFF parasite,

This is pretty much the best he can do. Sad and pathetic little man that
he is.


--
"Only Buddhism is compatible with science. It covers the smallest
particles to the largest creations of the cosmos. It is the only
religion capable of scientific truth."

Albert Einstein
   

Copyright © 2006 inetbot   -   All rights reserved