inetbot web crawler
Main  |  Get access to the repository  |  API  |  The robot  |  Publications  |  Usenet Groups  |  Plainweb  | 
 inetbot - Groups (beta)

Current group: soc.motss

Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?

Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?  
Fritz
 Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?  
Andrealphus
From:Fritz
Subject:Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:28:43 -0500
gigo448@netscape.net wrote:

> Andrealphus wrote:
> > gigo448@netscape.net wrote:
> > > gigo448@netscape.net wrote:
> > >> Andrealphus wrote:
> > >>> gigo448@netscape.net wrote:
> > >>>> Andrealphus wrote:
> > >>>>>>> But my common sense seems superior to yours.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> How do you suppose i arrived at my own answer? I've got
> > >>>>>> a Math equivalancy of ninth grade.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> That explains it then. No common sense, and no math
> abilities,
> > >>>>> perhaps you should go back to school.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Then why would you choose seven bullets to play russian roulette
> > >>>> with instead of 2? I certainly wouldn't.
> > >>>
> > >>> I am not choo
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> "Guess I'd opt for polygamy."
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 7 wives is seven chances, duhhh!!!
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > And if ONE gets it they ALL get it KABOOM!
> >
> > How is one going to get it if they stay within the marriage? Do you
> think
> > that HIV just magically appears one day?
>
> Tell that to the 100's of thousands of recipients who simply
> woke up and realized they had it one day. No matter how many
> partners they had. EVERY person is at RISK, and IS a Risk. You
> are living in a dream world if you think they *magicly* aren't.

What the hell are you talking about?

--
Fritz
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Religion = tyranny.
From:Andrealphus
Subject:Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:Sun, 23 Jan 2005 20:30:48 GMT
Fritz wrote:
> gigo448@netscape.net wrote:
>
>> Andrealphus wrote:
>>> gigo448@netscape.net wrote:
>>>> gigo448@netscape.net wrote:
>>>>> Andrealphus wrote:
>>>>>> gigo448@netscape.net wrote:
>>>>>>> Andrealphus wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> But my common sense seems superior to yours.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How do you suppose i arrived at my own answer? I've got
>>>>>>>>> a Math equivalancy of ninth grade.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That explains it then. No common sense, and no math
>>>>>>>> abilities, perhaps you should go back to school.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then why would you choose seven bullets to play russian roulette
>>>>>>> with instead of 2? I certainly wouldn't.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am not choo
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Guess I'd opt for polygamy."
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 7 wives is seven chances, duhhh!!!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And if ONE gets it they ALL get it KABOOM!
>>>
>>> How is one going to get it if they stay within the marriage? Do
>>> you think that HIV just magically appears one day?
>>
>> Tell that to the 100's of thousands of recipients who simply
>> woke up and realized they had it one day. No matter how many
>> partners they had. EVERY person is at RISK, and IS a Risk. You
>> are living in a dream world if you think they *magicly* aren't.
>
> What the hell are you talking about?

He doesn't really know. He lost this argument several posts ago. I'm just
playing with him at this point.

--
"Only Buddhism is compatible with science. It covers the smallest
particles to the largest creations of the cosmos. It is the only
religion capable of scientific truth."

Albert Einstein
   

Copyright © 2006 inetbot   -   All rights reserved